The notice of evidentiary hearing should specifically mention about the evidentiary hearing. If the hearing is only for the regular hearing and evidentiary hearing gets done then that hearing should be invalid as one party only prepared for the regualr hearing.
It is unjust to hold the evidentiary hearing when the notice of the hearing states only the regular hearing.
Unilateral presentation of the evidences by one party will prejudice the party seriously.
The case where the ruling has to be reversed because of unjust presentation of the evidences by one party .
Dr. Jain’s case no 2016-CA-7260-O against Michael Furbush and Tom Wert.
Ruling from the hearin of June 5, 2017 with Judge Higbee.