Category Archives: PROACTIVE

Reversal of Ruling due to Improper Notice of Evidentiary Hearing

The notice of evidentiary hearing should specifically mention about the evidentiary hearing. If the hearing is only for the regular hearing and evidentiary hearing gets done then that hearing should be invalid as one party only prepared for the regualr hearing.

It is unjust to hold the evidentiary hearing when the notice of the hearing states only the regular hearing.

Unilateral presentation of the evidences by one party will prejudice the party seriously.

The case where the ruling has to be reversed because of unjust presentation of the evidences by one party .

Dr. Jain’s case no 2016-CA-7260-O against Michael Furbush and Tom Wert.

Ruling from the hearin of June 5, 2017 with Judge Higbee.

Evidentiary Hearing by Tom Wert and Michael Furbush

Tom Wert is defending a claim for common law fraud for the attorneys. During the proceeding of the regular hearing, along with Michael Furbush started doing testimonies and presenting evidences. How unfair to do this when all the rules for evidentiary Hearing states that the the notice of the hearing should specify that the hearing should be evidentiary to have proper due process. Dr. Jain brought the claim of fraud against the attorney simply because Dr. Jain lost precious time of her practice in defending the claim which could not be valid without the document. Document was missing so the attorneys made up the document and labeled certified to make the Jains believe to that.

Tom Wert is trying to defend his claim and one of his tactic along with Michael Furbush is to present the evidences even when it was unlawful.

Dr. Usha Jain has to work hard and spent much energy against the judgment which was given with unlawful heairng held in 2017. Dr. Jain’s hard work resulted in REVERSAL OF JUDGMENT.

Conclusion: Evidentiary hearing requires the notice of evidentiary hearing. Tom Wert was wrong in doing the testimonies etc.

Unlawful acts would not be tolerated in the Justice System of America. Citizens stand your ground.

This is a real story and not a legal advice in any way.

Proactive Dr. Jain Orlando Easter Celebration in Devotion

Dr.  Jain firmly believes in God.  This year in 2018, Dr. Jain celebrated Vasant Navratri from March 18 to 26th and celebrating Easter for fourteen days. Dr. Jain’s Easter celebration is connected to the following story.

JJ is a couple who believed in God and the couple was working at their house.  A thief knocked on the door and demanded $1000 dollars but couple refused to give the money because it was their money. The thief tried to fight with the couple but when he found out that the couple is really strong and he might get in trouble. The thief started running away but the couple started running back after him.  Couple thought it was wrong for the thief to come and ask for the money.  The couple continued to run but after a while the couple ended in the territory of the thief where all the people tried to gang up on the couple and tried to hurt them. Couple  had firm belief in God and continue to fight and it was Easter time. Couple is still fighting in the name of God but the couple thinks that they will be saved because God would shower his blessings upon them. Hope that  the couple will be blessed at the Easter time and successful in the mission against the wrongdoing of the thief.

The couple may need some extra prayers this Easter so please pray for the  victory of truth and honesty in your prayers.

Part II : Police was there and the thief told the police that he was not the thief but on the contrary, the couple is the one who wanted to take his money.

Police was there, he tried to ask the couple questons as if the couple is the one who was a problem and his duty was over so another police came in.

Couple got very disappointed but did not give up the hope and continue to pray to God. The couple found something to prove their case and hoping that the 2nd police will believe the couple. 2nd police seemed like that he was part of the gang.

This Easter, the couple was rewarded by giving them evidence what was needed.

Now the next episode what police says about the evidence the couple produced in their defense

The result would be announced once it is found out.

 

Violation of Due Process by Judge Layne Smith Tallahasse.

Judge Layne Smith of Tallahassee small court violated the fundamental due process law and deprived Dr. Jain for the hearing and directly went for the judgment to give the attorney fees to Mr. Brewton. Attorney Mr. Brewton is well connected to Judge Layne Smith. Judge was elected and he took a day off from the court but order came on September 1, 2016 about the attorney fees for the hearing. Judge J. Layne Smith corruptly violated the constitutional right and law of fundamental due process of Dr. Jain.

J. Layne Smith just received the contribution from attorney Brewton of $ 2, 500.00 dollars for his campaign. The limit is only one thousand dollars per person but Brewton contributed another $1,000.00 dollars from his law firm and $500.00 dollars from his wife.

Previously, Judge Flurry was recused by Dr. Jain but when judge J. Layne Smith came on the duty after being elected  went directly for unconstitutional and violation of due process.

He abused his power of being the court officer.

Judge Layne Smith of Tallahassee small court violated the fundamental due process law and deprived Dr. Jain for the hearing and directly went for the judgment to give the attorney fees to Mr. Brewton. Attorney Mr. Brewton is well connected to Judge Layne Smith. Judge was elected and he took a day off from the court but order came on September 1, 2016 about the attorney fees for the hearing. Judge J. Layne Smith corruptly violated the constitutional right and law of fundamental due process of Dr. Jain.

 

Proactive Dr. Usha Jain against Morgan and Morgan Orlando

Suit filed by Ryan Morgan of Morgan and Morgan law firm which was for wage and hour.

The suit was a fee driven suit and did not have any basis. Many negligences and the most example was that he filed the suit on the company which did not even exist.

Attorney fee driven suits where attorney is so lazy that did not check the record before filing the suit. Attorney Ryan Morgan wasted time of the court by filing for the wrong party and later amended it.

Then he wasted further time of the court and tried to intimidate the self-representing litigant Dr. jain and Mr. Jain. Attorney Ryan Morgan thought he will collect the settlement from Dr. Jain and Mr. Jain.  When it was known to him that Dr. Jain and Mr. Jain will take him to jury, then he decides to drop the case.

He could not afford to pay the cost of the deposition etc.

Attorney Ryan worked for free for eight months for his own bad karma to bring the suit against the Jains. He also lost money from his pocket in filing the suit

Attorney fee driven frivolos suits should not be tolerated in the Court of Law specially in United States of America..

Dr. Usha Jain’s Mission Against Frivolous Law Suits Orlando

Dr. Usha Jain is an expert in anti-aging medicine and her mission is against the frivolous law suits which hurts the working citizen who are the production for the country.  This is how it works.

  1. A hotel employer gets sued for nonsense claim for wage & hour in Federal Court.
  2. Employer do not have a choice but to hire an attorney as it is a corporation.
  3. Plaintiff’s attorney feels that they got the jack pot so they can dig some gold without working.
  4. Many employers have to settle the claim even if they know that they were right.
  5. To fight a claim, you have to spend money on the attorney and take the stress.
  6. Productive citizen who did not do anything wrong becomes the victim of attorney’s filing of law suit.
  7. Claim gets settled even if the employer was right and the plaintiff’s attorney was wrong.
  8. Fee driven suits are the cause of harassment of working citizens and should not be tolerated.
  9. Dr. Jain defended two such law suits for her hotel in Orlando and Clermont.
  10. Dr. Jain was able to work hard and learn the rules and was able to represent herself in the Federal Court.
  11. Dr. Jain was able to get both claims for wage and hour dropped because Dr. Jain and Mr. Jain were right and paid the employee properly.
  12. Dr. Jain felt it was her mission was to stand the ground and not to settle and ultimately the attorneys dropped the claim.
  13. One claim was from Morgan and Morgan and Ryan Morgan was the culprit for nonsense claim.

Fake News by Amanda Ober of Wesh 2 News Orlando

Dr. Usha Jain is the director of the Emergicare Center and works seven days a week for treating the emergencies in the community. Amanda Ober tried to defame Dr. Jain by coming to her emergency center. Dr. Jain refused to talk to her as Dr. Jain was working. Amanda Ober gave the news about Dr. Usha Jain which was totally wrong. Amanda Ober gave the news of the hotel which is not even owned by Dr. Jain. Dr. Jain feels that her news was fake news and totally driven to defame Dr. Usha Jain by giving the wrong news about her.

ake news by Amanda Ober is a type of hoax or deliberate spread of misinformation  via  the news media and was with the intent to mislead  in order to gain financially by producing eye-catching  headlines  in order to increase readership and, in internet-based stories, online sharing.  In the latter case, profit is made in a similar fashion to clickbait and relies on ad-revenue generated regardless of the veracity of the published storyies.

Dr. Jain was determined to file the suit against her and channel 2 news but her commitment to the community is to serve the community and not running around in to the Court.

Beware of Amanda Ober’s fake news as it happenned in Dr. jain’s case and specially for President Trump.

 

Inhumane Acts of Attorney Chuck David Johnson of Leesburg

Dr. Usha Jain, who is medical director for the Emergi-Care Medical Center for 31 years. Dr. Jain worked in the emergency room of a trauma hospital in Orlando and is an expert in the emergency medicine.

Dr. Jain owns a hotel in Clermont and was given a citation for the sign which had a grandfathered in status but the code officer went after the owner anyway.  Owner have an alleged fear of another Govt. agency collaborating with the Code Enforcement.

Special Master Chuck Johnson gave the order, regardless of the motion presented for an extension because of health reasons.

Owner feel that Chuck David Johnson who is the Special Master for the Lake County is biased due to  Indian owner of a small business. Owners also feel that Special Master Chuck David Johnson may have some collaboration with attorney Rick Strong who has a personal vendetta against Dr. Jain. Special Master Chuck Johnson may have done this inhumane acts due to connection with Rick Strong. Chuck David Johnson an attorney of Leesburg ignored the motion of Dr. Jain for conflict of interest.

Dr. Jain decided to run for the Governor of State of Florida for that reason and signed up after the hearing on May 18, 2016 in Lake County with Chuck David Johnson.

 

Fiduciary Duty of Govt . Officials and Dr. Usha Jain 32819

Relationship wherein  one person has an obligation to act for another’s benefit. A fiduciary duty is a legal duty to act solely in another party’s interests. Parties owing this duty are called fiduciaries. The individuals to whom they owe a duty are called principals. Code officers have fiduciary duty  to the taxpayers. Dr. Usha Jain is running forr commissioner for district 1 and want to educate the community about fiduciary duty of the Govt. official to taxpayers.

Dr. Jain belives that Govt . officials including the code officers owes a duty to the taxpayer to do the right job and work with the citizens so community can be better.

Harassment of the citizens would be cosedered a violation of the  fiduciary duty.

Dr. Usha Jain interviewed one of her patient Dr. Alvin White as he was leaving Dr. Jain’s office and Dr. Jain asked him to explain the fiduciary duty in simple words to the citizens.

 

 

Amanda Ober Breaking News Jayma Ambe Hotel Inspection

Amanda Ober asks the guest to see if she likes it at the hotel and when melissa said she liked at the hotel then Amanda Ober decides to not interview her. Amanda Ober also asked the uncle of Melissa but he also said hte positive about the hotel but then Amanda Ober did not want to interview him. Melissa’s statement is the prime example of the malice motive of Amanda Ober against Dr. Jain