Category Archives: Uncategorized

Electronic Filing for Self-Representing Citizens Dr. Jain

Dr. Usha Jain is an expert in Emergency medicine, anti-aging and regenerative medicine and also pediatricts.

Dr. Usha Jain is very proud American citizen who migrated from India after getting married to her husband who had just finished the masters in Engineering from Youngstown Ohio University.

Dr. Usha Jain has defended many frivolous cases of her husband’s hotels in the past and truly believes that frivolous cases should be come to an end.

Dr. Jain and Mr. Jain had represented themselves in the Federal Court and were successful by their hard work.

The Federal Court allows self-representation but does not allow electronic filing through the computer. The attorney can file electronically but self-representing citizens are barred from electronic filing.

Dr. Jain is helping the self-representing citizens to be able to file electronically during COVID-19 Pandemic to prevent exposure to Coronavirus and to save the lives of the citizens.

Dr. Jain has submitted her reasons to Rulemaking committee to get electronic filing during Covid-19 pandemic.

The letter submitted is as below:

Dr. Usha Jain, Board certified in Emergency Medicine, Anti-aging, and Pediatrics
Date June 23, 2020
Rebecca A. Womelsdorf, Secretary
Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure
United States Judicial Conference
One Columbus Circle, NE
Washington, D.C. 20544
Via email:
Re: Comment on Emergency Rulemaking and URGENT Efforts to prevent the spread of deadly COVID-19 and related deaths
Respected Ms. Womelsdorf:
As a concerned board-certified emergency medicine physician, I respectfully request that you, as a member of the rulemaking committee, facilitate an administrative change allowing self-representing people to file electronically in the Federal Court so that self-representing people have equal access to filing and receive the real-time orders of the court. This is especially relevant during the current tragic times of global pandemic and the spread of COVID-19. The risk of exposure and spread of the deadly virus is increased when people are required to visit the post office to mail the paper filings as they must stand in line with those who may be infected in order to calculate and purchase postage or they must touch unsanitized self-service machines that are touched by many others each hour. Hand delivery to the court also increases exposure to other members of the public unknown to them as well as employees.
The appellate Federal Court (11th Circuit) and state court both allow filing electronically for self-representing citizens. Because electronic filing has ZERO risks for spreading COVID-19
and thus could help prevent the spread of the deadly disease, I urge you to allow the Federal Court, by administrative order, to provide the electronic filing option to self-representing citizens.
There are GUIDELINES set forth by the CDC, FL Surgeon General, President Trump and Florida Governor DeSantis, and many other leaders and experts to prevent the spread of coronavirus. These guidelines have included closing government offices when possible and having many employees work remotely and electronically.
Electronic filing for self-representing citizens would also help those with medical conditions,
physical limitations, and handicapped status. It would “level the playing field” for those who choose not to hire an attorney.

I humbly request that you evaluate and use logical reasoning for equal opportunity to prose litigants. This would increase judicial efficiency, lessen hardship due to medical disability and now to protect the safety of lives of prose litigants, especially those over 70 with comorbid conditions and high risk of mortality.
Gratefully yours,
Dr. Usha Jain
Compelling Reasons for the Changes in our Democracy
Inherent Prejudice to Prose Litigants due to Risk of Safety of Lives, Hardship due to Medical Disability, Real-Time Lag in receiving the Orders, and Unequal Opportunity to Access the Court.
In Federal Court in Orlando, electronic filing is only for attorneys and the only option for prose is via postal mail or hand delivery for filing motions and receiving orders. This inequality has inherent prejudice to citizens who are representing themselves in the court (pro se).
Following are the compelling concerns:
A. Risk of the safety of lives from exposure from COVID-19
Not allowing prose litigants to file electronically conflicts with the GUIDELINES set forth by the CDC, FL Surgeon General, President Trump, and Governor DeSantis to prevent the spread of coronavirus as well reckless disregard to lives of the citizens from exposure to
1. Mailing exposes risk for coronavirus as one has to stand in the line with the general public to get an estimate of postage for the weight of papers which varies with every filing;
2. Plaintiffs have to leave in fear from exposure of coronavirus;
3. Delivery to the courthouse has a similar higher risk
The above risks are higher if a prose litigant is in a high-risk group due to their age and medical conditions like diabetes, high blood pressure, kidney, and heart condition.
B. Prejudice due to Medically disable prose litigants and Undue Hardship:
1. This prejudice toward medically disabled litigants is against the guidelines to accommodate disabled citizens, as the disabled person still has to drive and walk either to the post office or courthouse. In our democracy, citizens should be aided in their path for justice and accommodations should be made for those with physical and/or health issues so that they may obtain the same justice as those without such issues.
2. If the accommodation of electronic filing can be granted at the discretion of the judge, it seems reasonable that this is an appropriate accommodation for those with a medical disability.
C. Prejudice and risk of Technical Default due to not Receiving the Orders Timely Prose litigants are subject to the risk of lost mail, clerical error, misdeliveries, etc. Prose litigants receive the order in the mail which may take several days and may not come in the mail. Once again, this is not equal access. Prose litigants are penalized for not having access to
electronic delivery of the court order. Those represented by counsel are given this electronic access and are NOT subject to that risk.
D. Unequal Justice and Violation of First Amendment Rights
The prose citizens should be allowed equal access to electronic filing. Granting access only to attorneys is unwise since it is attorneys who are least in need of such service; rather, the pro se litigants who might have mobility or cost issues would need such access the most. This is a
violation of the 1st Amendment rights of the citizens.
Also, for the service of the Order, in electronic filing, the document automatically comes to your email address and would be seen right away vs waiting for the mail for several days risking the physical loss of the mail as it changes hands frequently. Attorneys get more time to file; they are permitted to file by midnight vs prose citizens who have to reach to the court by 4 pm to avoid default. Mail also has uncertainty and the extra
burden of cost (legal carriers or mailing by certified mail).
Because lawyers and courts are so intertwined, there seems to be a bias that legal professionals are needed for access to the court. This is neither democracy nor our law but maybe a bias. The prose citizens should be allowed equal access to the court system by electronic filing.
The prose citizens should be given equal access to the current electronic filing procedures afforded to others, and this is especially critical during a time of national pandemic and threat of exposure to deadly COVID-19 virus. The infrastructure for electronic filing exists, the prose citizens who own technology required to utilize the system in place for electronic filing should be able to use the court system currently being used by counsel for the benefit of other citizens as well as by some other citizens approved by a judge. Finally, lack of equal access opens the door for manipulation of technical default for prose citizens. If some judges have predetermined opinion regarding prose litigants, they can refuse electronic access to prose and the case can be easily be manipulated for technical default for
prose citizens. Other judges grant access to prose litigants, further deteriorating equal access for some. Some have been denied equal access even after showing undue medical hardship and among COVID-19 risks during a stay-at-home order.
The following are the statements by other people in favor of electronic filing:
From: Buck Maker
To: Rules Committee Secretary
Subject: emergency rules
Date: Monday, May 11, 2020, 8:17:35 AM
Rather than use the pandemic to make access to courts more restricted than it is now, you might make it more open by allowing all plaintiffs to file electronically, without the favor of lawyers, or fear of the pro se, especially, who are routinely, treated like “trash” in the notorious words of
your former Justice Posner.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: David Michaels
To: Rules Committee Secretary
Subject: Proposed Rule Amendment
Date: Thursday, May 07, 2020, 12:32:55 PM
Dear US Courts:
Please pass a rule that requires all district courts to allow any party to a proceeding to electronically file documents in their proceeding, even if they are self-represented parties acting pro se. The WDNY has a local rule that requires prose litigants to file documents either in person or by mail. This creates a disadvantage for a party when there are time constraints or tight filing deadlines. Thank you,
David Michaels, J.D
From: Lemuel Bray
To: Rules Committee Secretary
Subject: Prose CM/ECF privileges
Date: Thursday, May 07, 2020, 12:21:15 PM
Recommend Prose litigants be granted CM/ECF privileges if they meet rules and decorum in filing in a trial period. No frivolous filing accepted and frivolous and impropriety filings a reason for withdrawal of the privilege on the order of a clerk.
Lemuel C Bray
From: Andrew Straw
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2020 12:38 PM
To: Rules Committee Secretary
Subject: COVID-19 and US Courts Rule Changes
I am interested principally in prose litigants and disabled court participants.
All court filings should be electronic (email or CM/ECF) for all prose filers.
All prose litigants should automatically be enrolled in “one free look.”

Coronavirus and Federal Judge Mendoza’s Denial of Electronic Filing

During the Pandemic of coronavirus, Federal Judge Mendoza denied electronic filing to a pro se (self representing) citizens who are 70 and 75 years old with high risk of mortality. At the time of global pandemic by coronavirus and national emergency where people are dying, Judge Mendoza refused to grant access to the electroninc case filing which has zero exposure to corona virus. This denial is directly in conflict with the guidelines set forth by CDC, President Trump and Governor DeSantis in their effort to save lives. The plea of the doctor for electronic filing was blantatly denied without any concern for risking lives of Asian citizen who servves the community for their medical needs. You can see this directly by looking at the Court case 6:19-cv-01635.

The self representing people are not allowed to file the claim electronically in federal court in Orlando, and only way the court filings can be done is by hand delivery to the court house or going to the post office to drop in the mail box. Due to this administative policy, self representing people are put at disadvantage in many ways so ultimatley they can lose a case.

The self representing citizen has to go to drop the papers with white coat, mask and gloves to avoid unnecessary exposure. You can see this directly by looking at the Court case 6:19-cv-01635.

global pandemic, coronavirus, national emergency, Judge Mendoza, electroninc filing, CDC, President Trump,Governor DeSantis,plea of Dr. Jain, electronic filing, blantatly denied without any concern for risking lives of Asian citizens, serves community, ECF system of court, federal judge, self representing, high risk mortality. death from coronavirus

Proactive Dr. Usha Jain & Disqualification of Chuck David Johnson

Dr. Usha Jain is the medical director and her goal is to serve the medical needs of the community.

Dr. Jain was given a wrongful violation which was defended by Dr. Jain without an attorney.

Dr. Usha Jain decided to run for County Commissioner District 1 which is her community she has been serving for 30 years.

Special Master Chuck Johnson gave the order of:

  1. fine of $250 dollars fine for the structures which is unsafe which is totally wrong.
  2. Fine of $50 dollars a day for the sign which was already repaired but he wants it to be removed because Chuck David Johnson thinks he can be a dictator in America.
  3. Dr. Jain is proactive and will countless hours to prove that Special Master is biased and is influenced by Rick Strong whose goal is to hurt Dr. Jain whatever it takes.
  4. Dr. Jain is also running for Orange County Commissioner District 1.

Attorney Chuck David Johnson disqualification

Dr. Jain is a medical Doctor and serves the community. Dr. Jain has a hotel in Clermont. The inspectors came because Health Department and Rick Strong complained about the hotel in retaliation.

Chuck Johnson denied the order which does not even make a sense for an extension.

Chuck Johnson  treated Dr. Jain very poorly when she tried to present the case.

Chuck Johnson gets paid by the city so justice does not mean anything. Money is everything.

These kind of lawyers should not be given the job of Special Mater and it is a shame that the citizens gets treated by Special Master Chuck Johnson like a Sadam Husain’s Court where justice does not exist.

Dr. Jain will be filing the motion for disqualification for the Special Master Chuck Johnson.

His unlawful, biased and discriminatory decisions are one of the reason Dr. Usha Jain signing for the Governor of the State of Florida.


Petition for Dr. Usha Jain for Orange County Commissioner District 1

Please click the link below to fill out the petition form


For Orange County Commissioner District 1, 2016

(District 1includes : Winter Garden, Oakland, Ocoee, Gotha Windermere, Dr. Phillips, Lake Buena Vista, Metro West, Sea World and Hunters Creek)

Dr. Jain was issued a wrongful violation by a code officer which was initiated by a commissioner’s office for a properly permitted grand fathered in medical center sign which has been in place for 10 years. Dr. Jain spent countless hours defending the violation herself and finally the case was withdrawn. Dr. Jain proved that with hard work, diligence & faith will prevail. Therefore, Dr. Jain is a candidate for County Commissioner.

Dr. Jain believes:

  • Each citizen should receive fair, equitable and consistent treatment (due process)
  • Each taxpayer dollar is to be spent constructively and efficiently to build stable, strong neighborhood (frivolous and political enforcement is costly and unnecessary).

Emergi-Care Medical Center

4800 S. Apopka-Vineland Rd

Orlando, FL 32819


Amanda Ober Breaking News Jayma Ambe Hotel Inspection

Amanda Ober asks the guest to see if she likes it at the hotel and when melissa said she liked at the hotel then Amanda Ober decides to not interview her. Amanda Ober also asked the uncle of Melissa but he also said hte positive about the hotel but then Amanda Ober did not want to interview him. Melissa’s statement is the prime example of the malice motive of Amanda Ober against Dr. Jain



Amanda Ober News Anchor WESH 2 Incompetency Jayma Ambe Hotel

Amanda Ober gave wrong news which challanges the competency of the news anchor WESH 2 news. Jayma Ambe Hotel is most affordable hotel on Colonial Drive. The hotel offers extended stay in the community. It is not a Marriot Hotel. The room is given to you clean and then your job is to keep it clean. If you do not keep it clean then you would produce roaches. Be civilized and do not trash the room. If you want to trash the room then blame it to yourself.  Say no to news reporter Amanda Ober if she pushes you to do the interview. Do not pacify her needs. Moreover it is true that you are responsible for your own room and if you do not like then go to another hotel. There are many hotel on Colonial Drive. It is very evident from all these that Amanda had a bad malice agianst theowners of the hotel.


Amanda Ober News Reporter Anchor Wesh 2 Violates Fiduciary duty

Amanda Ober violates fiduciary duty to the citizens by violating the fiduciary duty to the citizens. News anchor should not be violating such duties to the citizens.  Amanda Ober’s duty was to giv ethe right news which was not biased and opinioneted. Moreover Amand Ober never talked to the owner and amanda Ober released the news by saying she tracked down the owner which she never did. Lying in the news is not acceptable for whatever reason.

Dr. Usha Jain was very devastated about Amanda Ober’s wrong news. How  Amanda Ober can get away with these kind of news. Jury will be out.


Breaking News Amanda Ober Story vs Dr. Usha Jain Story

Dr. Jain is learning how to give the news because one day she wants to have a channel to help citizens where Dr. Jain can do a program.

Amanda Ober gave the news about Dr. Jain which did not make any sense. Why Amanda Ober will bring Dr. Jain in the news when Dr. Jain works at the emergency center. Is that because Dr. Jain is running for the commissioner or because Dr. Jain is Indian. Jury is out.



Amanda Ober News Biased Unilateral about Jayma Ambe Hotel

Amanda Ober gave the news about Jayma Ambe hotel  few months ago. Dr. Usha Jain was very devastated that how the news anchor Amanda Ober can give the wrong news and bring Dr. Jain in the picture. Amanda Ober’s news was totally wihtout any facts. Dr. Jain is blessed to do the community service for all the urgent care needs and why Amanda Ober needed Dr. Jain in Amanda Ober’s  news. Dr. Jain is running for the commissioner of Orange County and Amanda Ober brought Dr. Jain in story of the hotel. VERY INTERESTING!!

Dr. Jain warned Amanda not to do the wrong things but Amanda Ober did not care as if somebody ordered her to do the story.

Anyway, Dr. Jain is doing her story now as Dr. Jain’s goal is to do her medicine and not ot rebutt Amanda. Dr. Jain decided that when she has time she will take care of the situation properly.

This is the video of the man and you can see that Amanda Ober was wrong.